Subventions gouvernementales et performances macroéconomiques dans les pays de la CEMAC : quel rôle pour la gouvernance ?

ZAKARIYAOU ZAKARIYAOU, Abdoul KARI

Résumé


Les subventions financières constituent un instrument de politique économique à la fois sensible et problématique. L’objectif de cette étude est d’analyser l’efficacité des politiques de subvention publique en termes de performance macroéconomique dans les pays membres de la CEMAC, en mettant un accent particulier sur le rôle de la qualité des institutions dans cette dynamique. Une approche méthodologique basée sur la méthode des moments généralisés en système permet d’atteindre cet objectif. Les résultats montrent que le financement public à travers les subventions directes affecte positivement et de manière significative la croissance du PIB et celle du PIB par habitant, mais seulement lorsque les institutions politiques sont prises en compte.


Mots-clés


Subventions publiques ; Performance macroéconomique ; qualité des institutions et CEMAC.

Texte intégral :

PDF

Références


 Allen, F., Qian , J., Qian, M., (2005). Law, finance, and economic growth in China. J. Financ. Econ. 77 (1), 57-116.

 Baghana, R. (2010). Public R&D Subsidies and Productivity: Evidence from firmlevel data in Quebec. UNU-MERIT Working Paper Series N° 2010-055.

 Baumann R. et Braga (1988). Export Financing in LDCs: The Role of Subsidies for Export Performance in Brazil. World Development. 16(7), 821-833.

 Bergström, F. (2000). Capital Subsidies and the Performance of Firms. Small Business Economics, 14: 183-193

 Bernini, C., Cerqua, A., & Pellegrini, G. (2017). Public subsidies, TFP and efficiency: A tale of complex relationships. Research Policy, 46(4), 751-767.

 Bernini C. et G. Pellegrini (2011). How are growth and productivity in private firms affected by public subsidy? Evidence from a regional policy. Regional Science and Urban Economics, N°41, 253-265

 Brander, J. and B. Spencer (1985). Export Subsidies and International Market Share Rivalry. Journal of International Economics, 18:83-100

 Byungkyu K. (2014). Government Support for SME Innovations in the regional industries: The Case of government financial support program in South Korea. Research Policy N°

 Chen, X., Lee, C. W. J., & Li, J. (2008). Government assisted earnings management in China. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 27, 262-274.

 Cin, B. C., Kim, Y. J., Vonortas, N. S., (2017). The impact of public R&D subsidy on small firm productivity : evidence from Korean SMEs. Small Business Economics, 48(2), 345-360.

 Claro, S. (2006). Supporting inefficient firms with capital subsidies: China and Germany in the 1990s. Journal of Comparative Economics, 34(2), 377-401.

 Clausen T. H. (2009). Do subsidies have positive impacts on R&D and innovation activities at the firm level? Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 20 (2009) 239-253

 De Mel, S., McKenzie, D., & Woodruff, C. (2010). Wage subsidies for microenterprises. American Economic Review, 100(2), 614-618

 Demidova, S., & Rodriguez-Clare, A. (2007). Export subsidies, productivity and welfare under firm-level heterogeneity. Pennsylvania State University mimeo.

 Desai, M. A., & Hines, J. R. (2008). Market reactions to export subsidies. Journal of International Economics, 74(2), 459-474.

 Doh, S., et Kim, B., 2014. Government support for SME innovations in the regional industries: the case of government financial support program in South Korea. Res. Policy, 43 (9), 1557-1569.

 Elgrably, N. (2006). Are Business Subsidies Efficient. Quebec, Montreal Economic Institute.

 FMI (2013). Réforme des subventions énergétiques en Afrique subsaharienne : expériences et enseignements. Département Afrique, Rapport N° 13/2.

 Girma S., H. Görg and I. Stepanok, (2019). Subsidies, spillovers and exports. Economics Letters, (2019), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2019.108840.

 Girma, S, Gong, Y., Görg, et H. Yu, Z (2009). Can Production Subsidies Explain China’s Export Performance? Evidence from Firm-level Data. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 111(4), 863-891.

 Gorg, H. and E. Strobl, (2007). The effect of R&D subsidies on private R&D. Economica 74, pp. 215-234

 Guo, D., Y. Guo, K. Jiangc (2018). Governance and effects of public R&D subsidies: Evidence from China. Technovation (2018) ; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2018.04.001

 Harris, R. (2005), « Capital subsidies and their impact on total factor productivity: firm-level evidence from northern ireland », Journal Of Regional Science, VOL. 45, N°.1, 49-74

 Howell, A. (2017). Picking winners in China: Do subsidies matter for indigenous innovation and firm productivity?. China Economic Review, 44, 154-165.

 Kamga B. F., A. M. Kountchou, A. Dzossa et R. N. Deffo (2021). Politiques de subvention, impacts macro-budgétaires et inégalités au Cameroun entre les années 2000 et 2020, Papiers de recherche AFD, N° 211.

 Katircioglu S. T., K. Sertoglu, M. Candemir, et M. Mercan (2015). Oil price movements and macroeconomic performance: Evidence from twenty-six OECD countries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 44, 257-270.

 Klodt H. (1987). R&D Subsidies and Export Performance of Manufacturing Industries. Technocation, 7 (1987) 51-61

 Lee E., M. Walker, C. Zen (2014). Do Chinese government subsidies affect firm value? Accounting, Organizations and Society 39 (2014) 149-169

 Lim, S., A. M. Morshed, et C. Khun (2017). Trust and macroeconomic performance: A two-step approach. Economic Modelling (2017), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2017.07.020

 Mattsson P., (2018). The impact of labour subsidies on total factor productivity and profit per employee. Economic Analysis and Policy (2018) ; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2018.09.007

 Sun X., X. Liu, Yun W., et Fang Y. (2019). The effects of public subsidies on emerging industry: An agent-based model of the electric vehicle industry. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 140, 281-295

 Tan, Y., Guan, J., & Karimi, H. R. (2013). The Impact of the subsidy policy on total factor productivity: an empirical analysis of China's cotton production. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2013.

 Vu Q. and Tuyen Q. T., (2020). Government financial support and firm productivity in vietnam. Finance Research Letters, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101667

 WelscH H., et J. KüHling (2016). Macroeconomic performance and institutional change: evidence from subjective well-being data. Journal of Applied Economics. Vol XIX, No. 2 (November 2016), 193-218.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.48395/IMIST.PRSM/rek-N22.35961

Renvois

  • Il n'y a présentement aucun renvoi.


Bookmark and Share