The Relation between ESP and GE and their Effect on Designing the Courses among Teachers of English in Departments of Constantine 1 University

Ouided SEKHRI

Abstract


The focus of this research is on the role of ESP practitioner who plays different roles such as being a researcher, an evaluator and so on. Also, this research casts light on the differences between presenting a course for EFL learners and presenting it for other learners of other disciplines. Doing so, ten teachers (five of ESP and five of both ESP and GE) from three departments and two universities have been selected and given an interview after observing the way they deliver their courses in the classroom. Results showed that ESP teachers in the English Department use the same methods for both the teaching of ESP and GE especially because most of them do not have authentic materials and mainly because they teach ESP at the English Department. In other departments, some ESP teachers play the five roles of the ESP practitioner, others do not. This study is based on the point of view of an ESP practitioner, an ELT teacher and an applied linguistics and methodology specialist researcher, in order to highlight the differences between GE and ESP, and to analyse the role of ESP teachers in some Algerian universities.


Keywords


ESP, GE, differences, the role of ESP teacher, ESP courses

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anthony, L. (1997). ESP: What does it mean? Why is it different? Retrieved March 20, 2019 from http://www.antlab.sci.waseda.ac.jp/abstracts/ESParticle.html

Basturkmen, H. (2006). Ideas and Options in English for Specific Purposes.London and New jersey: ESL and Applied Linguistic Professional Series: Eli Hinkel, Edition.

Bojovic, M. (2006). Teaching foreign language for specific purposes: teacher development, in:www. Pelf. Uni. Lj. Si/atee ! 978-961-6637-06-0/487-493. Pdf. Retrieved in July, 2019.

Carter, D. (1983), Some Propositions about ESP, The ESP Journal, 2:131- 137.

Dickins, R. R & Germaine, K. (1992). Evaluation. Oxford: OUP.

Dudley-Evans, T., & St John, M. (1998). Developments in ESP: A multi-disciplinary approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from https://books.google.com/

Gatehouse, K. (2001). Key Issues in English for Specific Purposes (ESP) Curriculum Development. Retrieved from http://iteslj.org/Articles/Gatehouse-ESP.html

Harmer, J. (2001).The Practice of English Language Teaching. Malaysia: Personal Education Ltd.

Hutchinson, T. & Waters, A. (1987). English for Specific Purposes: A learning centred approach. Cambridge: CUP.

Johns, T. F. & Dudley-Evans, T. (1988). An experiment in team teaching overseas postgraduate students of transportation and plant biology. In J.Swales (Ed.), Episodes in ESP. Prentice Hall.

Larson-Freeman, D. (2000) Techniques and Principles in Language Teaching. China: OUP

Mackay, R. and Mountford, A. (1978) English for Specific Purposes: A case Study Approach. London: Longman.

Nunan, D. & Lamb, C. (1996). The Self-Directed Teacher: Managing the learning process. UK: CUP.

Robinson, P (1991) ESP Today. London: Prentice Hall International Ltd.

Savignon, S. J. (1987). What’s what in communicative language teaching? English Teaching Forum, (2) p 23.

Strevens, P. (1988). ESP after twenty years: A re-appraisal. In M. Tickoo (Ed.), ESP: State of the Art (pp. 1-13). Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Centre.

William, K. (2010). In what ways, if any, does the role of the ESP teacher differ from that of a teacher of GE? And to what extent is it necessary for the teacher of ESP to have knowledge of the student’s subject or professional discipline? In: http://Study mode.com/essays.html. Retrieved in July, 2019.

Widdowson, H. G. (1990). Aspects of Language Teaching. China: OUP.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Online ISSN: 2605-762X

Print ISSN: 2605-6658