Reading for Writing as Reciprocal Reinforcement in Vocabulary Acquisition

Brian. J. ENGLISH

Abstract


This paper revisits Swain’s Pushed Output Hypothesis to set a basis for explaining the merits of reading for writing in L2 instruction. Writing assignments are a type of pushed output that help students understand the gap between what they would like to communicate and what they are able to communicate. Although the gap results from lack of linguistic ability in syntax as well as lexis, this paper will focus on how reciprocal reinforcement in reading and writing creates a greater depth of semantic processing that aids in greater retention of newly acquired vocabulary words. Reciprocal reinforcement of vocabulary in reading-for-writing lessons can aid in raising students awareness of their gaps between understanding new vocabulary and being able use those words to create meaningful messages. This conscious-raising function of reciprocal reinforcement triggers cognitive processes such as language learners testing their individual hypotheses of how the target language works.

Keywords


EFL writing; EFL reading; reading for writing; schemata building

Full Text:

PDF

References


Barcroft, Joe. (2004). Second Language vocabulary acquisition: A lexical input processing approach. Foreign Language Annals.37, (2), pp. 200 – 208.

Brown, H. Douglas. (2007). Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. New York: Pearson Education.

Carson, Joan G. (1993). Reading for writing: Cognitive perspectives. In Joan G. Carson and Ilona Leki (Eds.), Reading in the Composition Classroom. Boston, MA: Heinle and Heinle.

Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671-684.

Folse, Keith S. (2008). Myth 1: Teaching vocabulary is not the writing teacher’s job. In Joy Reid(Ed.), Writing Myths: Applying Second Language Research to Classroom Teaching (pp. 1–17). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Grabe, William. (1991). Current developments in second language reading research. TESOLQuarterly, 25, (3), pp. 375 – 406.

Hirvela, A. (2004). Connecting Reading and Writing in Second Language Writing Instruction. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

Kessler, Greg. (2009). Student-initiated attention to form in wiki-based. Language Learning and Technology, 13, (1), pp. 79–95. Retrieved from: http://llt.msu.edu/vol13num1/kessler.pdf

Krashen, Stephen. (1985). The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications. Harlow: Longman.

Krashen, Stephen. (2004). The Power of Reading: Insights from Research. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann

Leki, Ilona. (1993). Reciprocal themes in ESL reading and writing. In Joan G. Carson and Ilona Leki (Eds.), Reading in the Composition Classroom. Boston, MA: Heinle and Heinle.

Mo, Haiwen. (2012). A study of the teaching of ESL Writing in Colleges in China. International Journal of English Linguistics, 2, (1), pp. 118 – 127.

Nation, I.S.P. (2009). Teaching ESL/EFL Reading and Writing. London: Routledge.

Olajide, Stephen Billy. (2010). Linking reading and writing in an English-as-a-second-language (ESL) classroom for national reorientation and reconstruction. International Education Studies, 3, (3), pp. 195 – 200.

Plakans, Lia. (2009). The role of reading strategies in integrated L2 writing tasks. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2009.05.001

Qian, Xinyu. (2010). A balanced approach to the teaching of intermediate-level writing skills to EFL students. English Language Teaching, 3, (2), pp. 13 -16.

Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In Gass, S. and Madden, C. (Eds.), Input in Second Language Acquisition,( pp. 235-256). New York: Newbury House.

Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principle and Practice in Applied Linguistics: Studies in honor of H.G. Widdowson (pp. 125-144). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Swain, M. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning (pp. 97-114). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1995). Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A

step towards second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 16(3), 371-391.

Tabatabaei, Omid and Ali, Hamed Amin. (2012). The effect of reading-based prewriting activities on the writing performance in an EFL setting. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 2, (3), pp. 371 – 382.

Tsai, Jui-min. (2006). Connecting reading and writing in college EFL courses. The Internet ESL Journal, XII, (12). Retrieved fromhttp://iteslj.org/Articles/TsaiReadingWritingConnection.html


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Online ISSN: 2605-762X

Print ISSN: 2605-6658