How Effective is Mediation as an Alternative Dispute Resolution Tool? A Case Study of Zirobwe Sub County Luweero District, Uganda.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48346/IMIST.PRSM/ajlp-gs.v8i5.53335Abstract
Context and background
The paper explores effectiveness of mediation as a tool for land dispute resolution in Luweero District in Uganda, focusing on Zirobwe Sub County. Land disputes are solved either through litigation where a court of law is involved and alternatively with what is called Alternative Dispute Resolution(ADR). Mediation is an important aspect of ADR that is encompassing the disputants and guided by mutual trust of the mediators. Much as it is envisaged to be mutual, there are challenges experienced by the method hence the need to explore its effectiveness.
Goal and objectives:
The specific objectives of the study were to evaluate the factors that influence mediation outcomes, to identify challenges encountered during mediation of land disputes, and to devise solutions to the challenges.
The methodology:
A case study research design method was adopted, and employed both quantitative and qualitative approaches to bring in-depth analysis and discussion of the problem. Simple random, and purposive sampling techniques were employed to select participants. A self- administered questionnaire was completed by 35 participants who had experienced land disputes and were handled using mediation. Twelve (12) interviews were conducted with key informants including local leaders and court mediators. One Focus Group Discussion was conducted with eight police officers. Quantitative data was analyzed using frequency tables and charts generated from SPSS Ver.27 and Microsoft Excel. Qualitative data were analyzed through thematic approach by categorizing data into themes which enhanced effective interpretation of results.
Results:
The key findings revealed several critical factors essential for the viability of mediation agreements. There is need for a comprehensive understanding of stakeholders' interests, enthusiastic engagement of the community, transparency, and inclusivity throughout the mediation process. The involvement of local leaders, personal integrity and experience of mediators, ongoing capacity building, and supportive frameworks are crucial for mediation to remain relevant as a land dispute resolution option. The findings revealed factors that are essential for better mediation outcomes, and these include; interpersonal skills of the mediators, procedural fairness, cultural sensitivity, and effective communication. Pervasive lack of awareness, lack of trust in the mediation process, and the enforceability of mediation outcomes present another notable challenge and barrier to mediation as an ADR tool. It is concluded that it is imperative to enhance mediation practices, strengthen enforcement mechanisms, and ensure viable commitment to agreements.
References
Bwire, T. & Benda, W (2020). The role of mediation in enhancing conflict resolution processes in Uganda. International Journal of Conflict Management, 31(2), 145-163.
Cao, J. ; Zhang, L. ; & Huo, Y (2023). Exploring mediation beyond courts in Africa: Opportunities and challenges. Journal of Social Issues in Africa, 27(3), 67-85.
Kabir, M (2023). Land and livelihoods: The essential role of land in human existence. Uganda Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 18(2), 123-135.
Kakooza, S (2007). Effective land dispute resolution mechanisms in Uganda: Analysis and recommendations. Uganda Law Journal, 23(2), 134-150.
Kakumba, U. & Seko, S (2018). Mediation and conflict resolution in Uganda: The role of culture and law. African Journal of Conflict Resolution, 18(2), 57-78.
Kakungulu, J (2023). Exploring effective land dispute resolution mechanisms in Uganda. Journal of African Studies, 45(2), 123-140.
Kanyegany, S (2019). Cultural dimensions of mediation in Uganda: Building bridges for conflict resolution. Uganda Journal of Conflict Studies, 17(1), 34-50.
Kasaija, J (2017). Land disputes in Luwero District: Causes and implications. Uganda Law Review, 15(1), 99-115.
Kasozi, A. & Namyalo, E (2017). Land disputes in Uganda: Challenges and implications for rural development. Journal of Rural Studies, 52, 82-92.
Kiggundu, R (2019). Embracing mediation for land dispute resolution in Uganda: Opportunities and challenges. Journal of Land Policy in Africa, 6(4), 74-88.
Kothari, C. R. (2014). Research methodology: Methods and techniques. New Delhi: New Age International Publishers.
Muwanguzi, H (2020). The importance of institutional frameworks for effective mediation in Uganda. Uganda Law Journal, 25(1), 45-67.
Nawaz, M. & Mutebi, A (2023). Understanding mediation as an alternative dispute resolution mechanism in Uganda. Uganda Law Journal, 1(1), 45-62.
Ojo, J (2023). Mediation as a tool for conflict resolution: Understanding the role of mediators in Uganda. Journal of Peacebuilding and Development, 12(2), 201-215.
Shafqat, U. ; Sarfaraz, K. ; & Iqbal, S (2022). The role of good faith in mediation processes: A comparative analysis. Africa Review, 9(1), 98-115.
Uganda Human Rights Commission. (2017). The state of human rights in Uganda. Retrieved from http://www.uhrc.ug
Published
Versions
- 31-05-2025 (3)
- 31-05-2025 (2)
- 31-05-2025 (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Some rights reserved 2025 African Journal on Land Policy and Geospatial Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The African Journal on Land Policy and Geospatial Sciences (AJLP&GS) is made available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/. Authors with free access retain the copyright of their manuscripts. All open access manuscripts are published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, etc. in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that applicable laws and regulations do not protect these names. Even though the advice and information in this journal are true and accurate as of the date of its publication, neither the authors, the editor, nor the publisher can assume any legal responsibility for any errors or omissions.

