Polycentric governance of collective rangelands in southern Tunisia
Paving the way for coordination
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48346/IMIST.PRSM/ajlp-gs.v7i3.47542Keywords:
Collective rangelands, polycentric governance, networks of adjacent action situations, Tunisia.Abstract
The governance system of collective rangelands in southern Tunisia (i.e., tribal grazing lands covering 1.5 million ha) entails several governmental and non-governmental actors. Thus, enabling collaboration between the different decision-making centers within this system becomes essential to guarantee its functioning. Following the implementation of the Program of Agro-pastoral Development and Promotion of Local Initiatives in South-eastern Tunisia (French acronym PRODESUD 2003-2020) by the Tunisian government and the International Fund for Agriculture Development, a pilot land-use scheme has been run to experiment with a set of new rangeland management rules alongside an alternative polycentric design. While the institutional change induced by such a policy experiment seems to be sufficiently debated by scholarship, little interest has been devoted to exploring the effectiveness of its simultaneous organizational prescriptions. Among these prescriptions are introducing new community-based organizations and promoting new rangeland management contracts to ensure a sustainable harvest of pastoral resources. The present communication aims to assess the effectiveness of this pilot organizational design around the concept of polycentric governance. To do so, we perform a two-step diagnostic research. We apply first to the analytic tool of Networks of Adjacent Action Situations (NAAS; McGinnis, 2011) to visualize the different subcomponents of the governance system and better understand the mandated patterns of interaction between them. Next, we refer to the output and process performance criteria suggested by Koontz et al (2019) to assess the performance of polycentric design embedded within the under-consideration pilot scheme. Overall, results highlight numerous intersections between the pilot organizational content and requirements of efficacy and coherence. However, besides pointing out several duplications of function between the new community-based organizations created by PRODESUD and the preexistent ones, our investigation stresses several concerns about the resilience of the suggested polycentric version, which seems to confirm the need for promoting an effective autonomy of local pastoral communities.
References
Abaab, A. (1994). Dynamique des systèmes fonciers et leurs impacts sur la gestion des ressources naturelles en zones steppiques maghrébines. Rapport de consultation pour le compte du Centre de Recherche pour le Développement international CANADA (CRDI) et communication au séminaire Impact des Systèmes Fonciers et des Modes de Propriété et d'Accès aux Ressources sur le Dégradation des Terres et la Désertification, Dakar, 7-9 mars 1994. 28 p.
Abaab, A.; Bouaicha, A. ; Hajji, A ; Saadani, Y. ; Gouhis, F. ; Kailen, J. ; Khemiri, H. (2020). Approches adoptées en Tunisie en matière de développement pastoral. In: Neffati, M. (ed.); Sghaier, M. (ed.); Khorchani, T. (ed.). Capitalisation de l’expérience tunisienne et valorisation des acquis dans le domaine du développement des territoires pastoraux. Revue des régions arides, 2020, numéro spécial n°47 (2-2020), pp.143-165.
Abdelkebir A. (2003). Les mutations socio-spatiales, et aspects anthropologiques en milieu aride: cas de la Jeffara tuniso-libyenne 1837-1956. Thèse de Doctorat, Université de Metz. 499 p.
Ben Saad, A. ; Abaab, A. ; Bourbouze, A. ; Elloumi, M. ; Jouve, A-M. ; Sghaier, M. (2009). La privatisation des terres collectives dans les régions arides tunisiennes : contraintes socio-économiques et impact sur l’environnement. Cas de la région de Tataouine, sud tunisien. Convention de recherche n° 8015/06/2007, IRA de Médenine/IRAM Paris. 152 p.
Carlisle, K.; Gruby, R.L. (2017). Polycentric systems of governance: a theoretical model for the commons. Policy Studies Journal 47 (2). https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12212.
CNEA. Centre National des Etudes Agricoles, Tunisie. (2020). Etude d’achèvement de la deuxième phase développement agro-pastoral et de promotion des initiatives locales pour le sud-est (PRODESUD-II). 149p.
Crawford, SES. ; Ostrom, E. (1995). A grammar of institutions. American Political Science Review, Volume 89, Issue 3, September 1995, pp. 582 – 600.
Crawford, SES. ; Ostrom, E. (2005). A grammar of institutions. In: Ostrom, E. (Ed.). Understanding institutional diversity (pp. 137–174). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Elloumi, M.; Sghaier, M. ; Dhehib, B.; Kadhkadhi, K. (2010). Changement institutionnel et développement durable: vers une nouvelle gouvernance du développement local et de la gestion des ressources naturelles. In : Bonte P., Elloumi
FIDA, Fond International de Développement Agricole. (2019). Programme de développement agro-pastoral et de promotion des initiatives locales pour le Sud-est, phase II (PRODESUD II), rapport de supervision finale.87p.
FIDA, Fond International de Développement Agricole. (2014). Programme de développement agro-pastoral et de promotion des initiatives locales pour le Sud-est, phase II (PRODESUD II), rapport de supervision finale.80p
FIDA, Fond International de Développement Agricole. (2012). Programme de développement agro-pastoral et de promotion des initiatives locales pour le Sud-est, phase II (PRODESUD II), rapport de conception finale.161 p.
FIDA, Fond International de Développement Agricole. (2002). Rapport et recommandation du président au conseil d’administration concernant une proposition de prêt à la république tunisienne pour le Programme de Développement Agropastoral et de Promotion des initiatives locales pour le Sud-est. 33p.
Heikkila, T; Villamayor-Tomas, S.; Garrick, D. (2018). Bringing polycentric systems into focus for environmental governance. Environmental Policy and Governance 28(4):207-211. DOI:10.1002/eet.1809
Hollard, G. ; Sene, O. (2010). Elinor Ostrom et la gouvernance économique. Revue d'Economie Politique, Dalloz, 2010, 120 (3), pp.441-452.
Kiser, L. ; Ostrom, E. (1982). Strategies of Political Inquiry (Ostrom, Elinor ed.), Chapter: The Three Worlds of Action, A Metatheoretical Synthesis of Institutional Approaches. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Koontz, T., Heikkila, T., Garrick, D., & Villamayor-Tomás, S. (2019). Assessing Performance of Polycentric Governance System Interactions. In A. Thiel, W. Blomquist, & D. Garrick (Eds.), Governing Complexity: Analyzing and Applying Polycentricity (Cambridge Studies in Economics, Choice, and Society, pp. 173-194). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781108325721.009.
Laâbar, M; Sghaier, M. (2021a). Les pâturages collectifs dans l’œil du législateur tunisien. Options Méditerranéennes, A 126, 2021 – Pastoralism and sustainable development. Proceedings of PACTORES project, Valenzano, Bari, 14-15 July 2021. doi: https://doi.org/10.48259/bc1960e
Laâbar, M; Sghaier, M. (2021a). Les changements institutionnels dans les parcours du sud de la Tunisie à la lumière des principes de la théorie des communs. African Journal on Land Policy and Geospatial Sciences, v. 5, n. 2, p. 427-441, mar. 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.48346/IMIST.PRSM/ajlp-gs.v5i2.31199
McGinnis MD (2011). Networks of adjacent action situations in polycentric governance. Policy Studies Journal 39:51–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00396.x
Nasr N., Bouhaouach T. (1997). Dynamiques juridique, technique et institutionnelle du partage des terres collectives en Tunisie. In: Bourbouze A. (ed.), Msika B. (ed.), Nasr N. (ed.), Sghaier Zaafouri M. (ed.). Pastoralisme et foncier: impact du régime foncier sur la gestion de l'espace pastoral et la conduite des troupeaux en régions arides et semi-arides. Montpellier: CIHEAM, 1997. p. 151-157.
Nefzaoui A, Saadani Y., Mares H., Meliane M., Maaouia T., Bedhiaf S. (2020). Aspects fonciers et législatifs. In: Neffati M. (ed.), Sghaier M. (ed.), Khorchani T. (ed.). Capitalisation de l’expérience tunisienne et valorisation des acquis dans le domaine du développement des territoires pastoraux. Revue des régions arides, 2020, numéro spécial n°47 (2-2020). p.55-78.
Ostrom, E. ; Basurto, X. (2013). Façonner des outils d’analyse pour étudier le changement institutionnel. Revue de la régulation [En ligne], 14 | 2e semestre / Autumn 2013, mis en ligne le 14 février 2014. DOI : 10.4000/regulation.10437
Ostrom, E. (2009). Design Principles of Robust Property-Rights Institutions: What have We Learned. In: Ingram, GK. (Ed); Hong, Y.H. (Ed). Property Rights and Land Policies. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy. Cambridge, Massachuttes. Pp 25-51
Ostrom, E. (2000). Collective Action and the Evolution of Social Norms. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14 (3): pp.137-158.
Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 357p.
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons. New York: Cambridge University Press. 295p
Ostrom, V.; Tiebout, C.M; Warren, R. (1961). The Organization of Government in Metropolitan Areas: A Theoretical Inquiry. American Political Science Review 55: 831– 42
Pahl-Wostl, C.; and Christian Knieper. 2014. “The Capacity of Water Governance to Deal with the Climate Change Adaptation Challenge: Using Fuzzy Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis to Distinguish between Polycentric, Fragmented and Centralized Regimes.” Global Environmental Change 29: 139– 54.
Sghaier, M. ; Frija, A. ; Elloumi, M. ; Jaouad, M. ; Fetoui, M. ; Kaabachi, I. ; Ghoudi, Z.A. 2020. Gouvernance et cadre institutionnel des parcours en Tunisie. In: Neffati, M. (ed.); Sghaier, M. (ed.); Khorchani, T. (ed.). Capitalisation de l’expérience tunisienne et valorisation des acquis dans le domaine du développement des territoires pastoraux. Revue des régions arides, 2020, numéro spécial n°47 (2-2020). pp.79-112.
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 31-05-2024 (3)
- 31-05-2024 (2)
- 31-05-2024 (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 African Journal on Land Policy and Geospatial Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The African Journal on Land Policy and Geospatial Sciences (AJLP&GS) is made available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/. Authors with free access retain the copyright of their manuscripts. All open access manuscripts are published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, etc. in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that applicable laws and regulations do not protect these names. Even though the advice and information in this journal are true and accurate as of the date of its publication, neither the authors, the editor, nor the publisher can assume any legal responsibility for any errors or omissions.
