The Dogma of Stakeholders Participation in Master Planning; Does It Work in Tanzania?

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48346/IMIST.PRSM/ajlp-gs.v7i3.45116

Keywords:

MASTER PLANNING, PARTICIPATION, STAKEHOLDERS PARTICIPATION, MASTER PLAN

Abstract

THE NEED TO MOVE FROM CONVENTIONAL TO PARTICIPATORY PLANNING APPROACH AMONG OTHER FACTORS WAS TO INCREASE SENSE OF OWNERSHIP AND INCORPORATE LOCAL KNOWLEDGE IN SPATIAL PLANS. HOWEVER, THERE ARE LIMITED JUSTIFICATIONS ON HOW STAKEHOLDERS’ PARTICIPATED IN PREPARATION OF THE DODOMA MASTER PLAN OF 2019. THIS STUDY CONTRIBUTES TO ONTOLOGICAL KNOWLEDGE OF THE COMMUNICATIVE PLANNING THEORY AND ARNSTEIN LADDER OF CITIZEN PARTICIPATION FROM THE POINT OF VIEW OF THE INEFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION AND POWER RELATION AMONG STAKEHOLDERS. THE STUDY EXPLORES WHETHER STAKEHOLDERS PARTICIPATION WAS GENUINE BY ANALYSING HOW THEY WERE MAPPED, INFORMED, EDUCATED AND MEANS THROUGH WHICH TRANSPARENT DECISION MAKING WAS ENSURED THROUGHOUT THE PROCESS. MIXED RESEARCH METHODS WERE ADOPTED WHEREBY QUALITATIVE DATA WERE COLLECTED FROM OFFICIALS, FOCUS GROUP DISCUSSION PARTICIPANTS AND KEY INFORMANTS INTERVIEWS THROUGH IN-DEPTH INTERVIEWS IN ORDER TO GRASP IN-DEPTH INFORMATION. QUANTITATIVE DATA WERE COLLECTED FROM LANDOWNERS USING STRUCTURED QUESTIONNAIRE SO AS TO GET THE FEEDBACK HOW THEY PARTICIPATED IN THE PROCESS. THEMATIC ANALYSIS WAS USED WHEREBY DIFFERENT THEMES WERE CREATED BASED ON DEDUCTIVE VARIABLES NARRATED FROM THEORIES AND LITERATURE REVIEW. QUANTITATIVE DATA WAS ANALYSED USING STATISTICAL PACKAGE FOR SOCIAL SCIENCE (SPSS). THE RESULTS SHOWED THAT THERE WAS INEFFECTIVE STAKEHOLDERS’ PARTICIPATION PARTICULARLY TO THE LANDOWNERS AND LOCAL COMMUNITY. THIS WAS CONTRIBUTED BY LOW LEVEL OF FACILITATION FROM OFFICIALS FROM THE CAPITAL CITY OF DODOMA WHICH RESULTED TO LACK OF EXTENSIVE STAKEHOLDERS’ PARTICIPATION. THE STUDY RECOMMENDS PROPER MAPPING OF STAKEHOLDERS, TIMELY AND WIDELY INFORMATION DISSEMINATION IN A TRANSPARENCY WAY AND RAISE AWARENESS CAMPAIGNS ABOUT MASTER PLAN TO MULTIFARIOUS STAKEHOLDERS.

Author Biography

Godwin Felix Pambila, Institute of Rural Development Planning -Dodoma

Urban and Regional Planner,

Assistant Lecturer at Institute of Rural Development Planning

References

Adjei Mensah, C., Andres, L., Baidoo, P., Eshun, J. K., & Antwi, K. B. (2017). Community Participation in Urban Planning: the Case of Managing Green Spaces in Kumasi, Ghana. Urban Forum, 28(2), 125–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12132-016-9295-7

Dinbabo, M. F. (2003). Development Theories, Participatory Approaches and Community Development. Institute for Social Development, University of the Western Cape.

Kaamah, A. F., Doe, B., & Asibey, M. O. (2023). Policy and practice: Stakeholders’ satisfaction with conventional and participatory land use planning in Ghana. Urban Governance, May, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ugj.2023.06.002

Nunbogu, A. M., Korah, P. I., Cobbinah, P. B., & Poku-Boansi, M. (2018). Doing it ‘ourselves’: Civic initiative and self-governance in spatial planning. Cities, 74, 32–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.10.022

Downloads

Published

31-05-2024

How to Cite

Pambila, G. F. (2024). The Dogma of Stakeholders Participation in Master Planning; Does It Work in Tanzania?. African Journal on Land Policy and Geospatial Sciences, 7(3), 743–757. https://doi.org/10.48346/IMIST.PRSM/ajlp-gs.v7i3.45116

Issue

Section

Land Policy and Regulatory Framework

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.