The Dogma of Stakeholders Participation in Master Planning; Does It Work in Tanzania?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48346/IMIST.PRSM/ajlp-gs.v7i3.45116Keywords:
MASTER PLANNING, PARTICIPATION, STAKEHOLDERS PARTICIPATION, MASTER PLANAbstract
THE NEED TO MOVE FROM CONVENTIONAL TO PARTICIPATORY PLANNING APPROACH AMONG OTHER FACTORS WAS TO INCREASE SENSE OF OWNERSHIP AND INCORPORATE LOCAL KNOWLEDGE IN SPATIAL PLANS. HOWEVER, THERE ARE LIMITED JUSTIFICATIONS ON HOW STAKEHOLDERS’ PARTICIPATED IN PREPARATION OF THE DODOMA MASTER PLAN OF 2019. THIS STUDY CONTRIBUTES TO ONTOLOGICAL KNOWLEDGE OF THE COMMUNICATIVE PLANNING THEORY AND ARNSTEIN LADDER OF CITIZEN PARTICIPATION FROM THE POINT OF VIEW OF THE INEFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION AND POWER RELATION AMONG STAKEHOLDERS. THE STUDY EXPLORES WHETHER STAKEHOLDERS PARTICIPATION WAS GENUINE BY ANALYSING HOW THEY WERE MAPPED, INFORMED, EDUCATED AND MEANS THROUGH WHICH TRANSPARENT DECISION MAKING WAS ENSURED THROUGHOUT THE PROCESS. MIXED RESEARCH METHODS WERE ADOPTED WHEREBY QUALITATIVE DATA WERE COLLECTED FROM OFFICIALS, FOCUS GROUP DISCUSSION PARTICIPANTS AND KEY INFORMANTS INTERVIEWS THROUGH IN-DEPTH INTERVIEWS IN ORDER TO GRASP IN-DEPTH INFORMATION. QUANTITATIVE DATA WERE COLLECTED FROM LANDOWNERS USING STRUCTURED QUESTIONNAIRE SO AS TO GET THE FEEDBACK HOW THEY PARTICIPATED IN THE PROCESS. THEMATIC ANALYSIS WAS USED WHEREBY DIFFERENT THEMES WERE CREATED BASED ON DEDUCTIVE VARIABLES NARRATED FROM THEORIES AND LITERATURE REVIEW. QUANTITATIVE DATA WAS ANALYSED USING STATISTICAL PACKAGE FOR SOCIAL SCIENCE (SPSS). THE RESULTS SHOWED THAT THERE WAS INEFFECTIVE STAKEHOLDERS’ PARTICIPATION PARTICULARLY TO THE LANDOWNERS AND LOCAL COMMUNITY. THIS WAS CONTRIBUTED BY LOW LEVEL OF FACILITATION FROM OFFICIALS FROM THE CAPITAL CITY OF DODOMA WHICH RESULTED TO LACK OF EXTENSIVE STAKEHOLDERS’ PARTICIPATION. THE STUDY RECOMMENDS PROPER MAPPING OF STAKEHOLDERS, TIMELY AND WIDELY INFORMATION DISSEMINATION IN A TRANSPARENCY WAY AND RAISE AWARENESS CAMPAIGNS ABOUT MASTER PLAN TO MULTIFARIOUS STAKEHOLDERS.
References
Adjei Mensah, C., Andres, L., Baidoo, P., Eshun, J. K., & Antwi, K. B. (2017). Community Participation in Urban Planning: the Case of Managing Green Spaces in Kumasi, Ghana. Urban Forum, 28(2), 125–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12132-016-9295-7
Dinbabo, M. F. (2003). Development Theories, Participatory Approaches and Community Development. Institute for Social Development, University of the Western Cape.
Kaamah, A. F., Doe, B., & Asibey, M. O. (2023). Policy and practice: Stakeholders’ satisfaction with conventional and participatory land use planning in Ghana. Urban Governance, May, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ugj.2023.06.002
Nunbogu, A. M., Korah, P. I., Cobbinah, P. B., & Poku-Boansi, M. (2018). Doing it ‘ourselves’: Civic initiative and self-governance in spatial planning. Cities, 74, 32–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.10.022
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 African Journal on Land Policy and Geospatial Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The African Journal on Land Policy and Geospatial Sciences (AJLP&GS) is made available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/. Authors with free access retain the copyright of their manuscripts. All open access manuscripts are published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, etc. in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that applicable laws and regulations do not protect these names. Even though the advice and information in this journal are true and accurate as of the date of its publication, neither the authors, the editor, nor the publisher can assume any legal responsibility for any errors or omissions.