Customary versus conventional land administration systems in Sub-Saharan Africa

Authors

  • Uchendu Eugene Chigbu Namibia University of Science and Technology
  • Ernest Uwayezu Centre for Geographic Information and Remote Sensing (CGIS), University of Rwanda
  • Mutjinde Katjuia Ovaherero Traditional Authority(Ouhonapare wOvaherero)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48346/IMIST.PRSM/ajlp-gs.v5i4.34099

Keywords:

Africa, customary land tenure, land administration, land governance, land tenure

Abstract

Context and background:

 The essential emerging reality from the statutory-versus-customary tenure debate is that both customary and statutory tenure systems have faults and good merits. With the unaffordability (in terms of technical, time and money cost) issues surrounding the statutory tenure for tenure security; and the population pressure, there is a need to reconsider the direct integration of relevant aspects of the customary tenure systems into the statutory land administration system (LAS) as part of the efforts towards a more realistic solution to the challenge of tenure insecurity in the continent.

Goal and Objectives:

This paper engages the debate on the potential of customary tenure (as a crucial aspect of customary land administration) system to spur the success of the statutory tenure (as a critical component of conventional land administration) system towards achieving realistic governance of land resources in Africa.

Methodology:

This article was presented at the Conference on Land Policy in Africa in 2021 (Kigali, Rwanda) to obtain stakeholder input. The applied methods include the use of an integrative literature review to identify aspects of customary land administration that have linkages to conventional land administration, an expert interview to verify aspects of customary land administration incorporable with conventional land administration and Mann-Whitney for statistical analysis to rate interviewees’ views on the relevance customary tenure to the four functions of conventional land administration.

Results:

The overall results hinged on identifying three critical aspects of customary land administration that directly add value to conventional land administration. These include (1) customary land administration contributions to land tenure and value functions of LAS through community land conflict management; (2) Customary land administration promotion of land tenure, value and use functions of LAS through collective titling; and (3), customary land administration promotion of land tenure and use of those functions through customary land allocation. Conclusions were drawn in support of the identified roles of those aspects to the development of effective LAS responsive to landowners’ and users’ needs.

References

ActionAid Kenya. (2018). Securing women’s land rights: scaling for impact in Kenya. Nairobi: ActionAid.

African Natural Resources Center-African Development Bank. (2015). Review of land tenure policy, institutional and administrative systems of Botswana (pp. 52). Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire.

Alden Wily, L. (2006). Governance and land relations. A review of decentralization of land administration and management in Africa (pp. 98). London: IIED.

Alden Wily, L. (2012). Customary Land Tenure in the Modern World Rights to Resources in Crisis: Reviewing the Fate of Customary Tenure in Africa. Rights and Resources Brief.

Alden Wily, L. (2018a). Collective Land Ownership in the 21st Century: Overview of Global Trends. Land, 7(2), 68.

Alden Wily, L. (2018b). The Community Land Act in Kenya Opportunities and Challenges for Communities. Land, 7(1), 12.

Antonio, D., Njogu, S., Nyamweru, H., & Gitau, J. (2021). Transforming Land Administration Practices through the Application of Fit-For-Purpose Technologies: Country Case Studies in Africa. Land, 10(5), 538.

Asaaga, F. (2021). Building on “Traditional” Land Dispute Resolution Mechanisms in Rural Ghana: Adaptive or Anachronistic? Land, 10(2), 143.

Baah, K., & Kidido, J. K. (2020). Sharecropping arrangement in the contemporary agricultural economy of Ghana: A study of Techiman North District and Sefwi Wiawso Municipality, Ghana. Journal of Planning and Land Management, 1(2), 50-62.

Bwire, B. (2019). Integration of African Customary Legal Concepts into Modern Law: Restorative Justice: A Kenyan Example. Societies, 9(1), 17.

Byamugisha, F. (2014). Agricultural Land Redistribution and Land Administration in Sub-Saharan Africa. Case Studies of Recent Reforms. Washington DC, USA: The World Bank.

Byamugisha, F. (2016). Securing Land Tenure and Easing Access to Land. Washington DC, USA: African Center for Economic Transformation (ACET) and Japan International Cooperation Agency Research Institute (JICA-RI).

Chigara, B. (2013). Southern African Development Community Land Issues: Towards a New Sustainable Land Relations Policy: Taylor & Francis.

Chigbu, U. E. (2019). Anatomy of women’s landlessness in the patrilineal customary land tenure systems of sub-Saharan Africa and a policy pathway. Land Use Policy, 86, 126-135.

Chigbu, U.E. (2020). Land, Women, Youths, and Land Tools or Methods: Emerging Lessons for Governance and Policy. Land, 9, 507.

Chigbu, U. E., Paradza, G., & Dachaga, W. (2019). Differentiations in Women’s Land Tenure Experiences: Implications for Women’s Land Access and Tenure Security in Sub-Saharan Africa. Land, 8(2), 22.

Chigbu, U.E., Wanyonyi A and Antonio D. (2020). Empowerment of youth through strengthening their land rights knowledge and research capacity: evidence from Eastern and Southern Africa. African Journal on Land Policy and Geospatial Sciences, 3 (1), 129-142.

Chigbu, U.E., Bendzko, T., Mabakeng, M.R., Kuusaana, E.D. and Tutu, D.O. (2021). Fit-for-Purpose Land Administration from Theory to Practice: Three Demonstrative Case Studies of Local Land Administration Initiatives in Africa, Land 10(5), 476.

Chigbu, U.E. (2022). Introducing Land Governance and Gender in the Context of Land Tenure. In Chigbu, U.E. (Ed.), Land governance and gender: The tenure-gender nexus in land management and land policy, pp., 1-12. CABI: United Kingdom.

Chigwenya, A., & Ndhlovu, P. (2016). Women, Land Use, Property Rights and Sustainable Development in Zimbabwe. In J. Etim (Ed.), Introduction to Gender Studies in Eastern and Southern Africa: A Reader (pp. 215-232). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

Chimhowu, A. (2019). The ‘new’ African customary land tenure. Characteristic features and policy implications of a new paradigm. Land Use Policy, 81, 897-903. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.04.014

Cotula, L. (2007). Changes in “customary” land tenure systems in Africa. London, UK.: International Institute for Environment and Development.

Cotula, L., Toulmin, C., & Hesse, C. (2004). Land tenure and administration in Africa: lessons of experience and emerging issues London, UK.: International Institute for Environment and Development.

Cousins, B., Cousins, T., Hornby, D., Kingwill, R., Royston, L., & Smit, W. (2006). Land Rights for African Development. From Knowledge to Action. Will Formalizing Property Rights Reduce Poverty in South Africa’s “Second Economy”? Questioning the Mythologies of Hernando de Soto CABI.

Delville, L. (2004, 10-12 November 2004). Registering and Administering Customary Land Rights. Current Innovations and Questions in French-Speaking West Africa. Paper presented at the Expert Group Meeting on secure land tenure: ‘new legal frameworks and tools, Nairobi, Kenya.

Enemark, S. (2009). Land Administration Systems: Managing Rights, Restrictions and Responsibilities in Land. Paper presented at the Map world forum, Hyderabad, India.

Enemark, S., Hvingel, L., & Galland, D. (2014). Land administration, planning and human rights. Planning Theory, 13(4), 331-348. doi: 10.1177/1473095213517882

Enemark, S., McLaren, R., & Lemmen, C. (2016). Fit-for-purpose land administration. Guiding principles for country implementation (pp. 132). Nairobi, Kenya: United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-Habitat).

Enemark, S., McLaren, R., & Lemmen, C. (2021). Fit-for-Purpose Land Administration-Providing Secure Land Rights at Scale. Land, 10(9), 972.

Food and Agriculture Organization. (2010). Statutory recognition of customary land rights in Africa. An investigation into best practices for lawmaking and implementation. Rome, Italy.

Grothmann, T., Petzold, M., Ndaki, P., Kakembo, V., Siebenhüner, B., Kleyer, M., Ndou, N. (2017). Vulnerability Assessment in African Villages under Conditions of Land Use and Climate Change: Case Studies from Mkomazi and Keiskamma. Sustainability, 9(6), 976.

International Development Law Organization (2010). Best practices in community land titling-Inception paper, Rome, Italy.

https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/139540/Land_InceptionPaper.pdf

Knight, R. (2010). Best practices in community land titling. Rome, Italy: International Development Law Organization (IDLO).

Kuusaana, E. D., & Eledi, J. A. (2015). Customary land allocation, urbanization and land use planning in Ghana: Implications for food systems in the Wa Municipality. Land Use Policy, 48, 454-466. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.06.030

Lall, S. V., Henderson, J. V., & Venables, A. J. (2017). Africa’s Cities: Opening Doors to the World. Washington DC, United States: World Bank.

Paradza, G., Mokwena, L., & Musakwa, W. (2020). Could Mapping Initiatives Catalyze the Interpretation of Customary Land Rights in Ways that Secure Women’s Land Rights? Land, 9(10), 344.

Payne, G. (2004). Land tenure and property rights: an introduction. Habitat International, 28(2), 167-179. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0197-3975(03)00066-3

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333-339. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

The World Bank. (2013). Land Governance Assessment Framework: Implementation Manual for Assessing Governance in the Land Sector (Vol. 2013): World Bank.

Torraco, R. J. (2016). Writing integrative literature reviews: Using the past and present to explore the future. Human resource development review, 15(4), 404-428. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1534484316671606

USAID. (2013). The future of customary tenure. Options for policymakers (pp. 18). Washington, DC. USA.

USAID. (2015). Tenure and global climate change program statutory recognition of customary land rights in Zambia. Lessons from southern Africa (pp. 9). Washington, DC. USA.

USAID. (2016). Integrating customary land tenure into statutory land law. Property rights and resource governance project. A review of experience from seven sub-Saharan African countries and the Kyrgyz republic. (pp. 13). Washington, DC. USA: The Rural Development Institute (RDI).

Uwayezu, E., & de Vries, T. W. (2019). Scoping land tenure security for the poor and low-income urban dwellers from a spatial justice lens. Habitat International, 91, 10. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2019.102016

Uwayezu, E., & Mugisha, J. (2018). Decoding Gender Justice in Land Conflicts Resolution in Rwanda. African Journal on Land Policy and Geospatial Sciences (1), 20.

Uwazie, E. (2011). Alternative Dispute Resolution in Africa: Preventing Conflict and Enhancing Stability. Africa Security Brief, 16.

Webster, J., & Watson, R. T. (2002). Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS Quarterly, 26(2), 13-23. doi: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4132319?origin=JSTOR-pdf

Wehrmann, B. (2008). Land conflicts: A practical guide to dealing with land disputes. Eschborn: GTZ.

Whittal, J. (2014). A New Conceptual Model for the Continuum of Land Rights South African Journal of Geomatics, 3(1).

Williamson, I., Enemark, S., Wallace, J., & Rajabifard, A. (2010). Land Administration for Sustainable Development New York: ESRI.

Zevenbergen, J., de Vries, W., & Bennett, R. M. (2015). Advances in Responsible Land Administration. New York: CRC Press.

Downloads

Published

29-09-2022

How to Cite

Chigbu, U. E., Uwayezu, E., & Katjuia, M. (2022). Customary versus conventional land administration systems in Sub-Saharan Africa. African Journal on Land Policy and Geospatial Sciences, 5(4), 663–682. https://doi.org/10.48346/IMIST.PRSM/ajlp-gs.v5i4.34099

Issue

Section

Land Policy and Regulatory Framework

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.