Formalization of Mining Rights in the East African Community; Cadastre perspective on artisanal mining rights
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48346/IMIST.PRSM/ajlp-gs.v5i5.32600Keywords:
Artisanal Mining, Mining cadastre, Property cadastreAbstract
Context and background
Artisanal mining has long been integral part of livelihood structure and economic systems of certain rural communities. Artisanal mining operates informally in developing countries coupled with social, environmental, and economic challenges. Formalization of artisanal mining is being adopted in many countries in order to tackle the challenges of artisanal mining. Formalization entails enactment of legislations for recognition of artisanal mining, creation of mining rights cadastre and granting of mining titles.
Formalization of artisanal mining has been embraced in East African community countries of Burundi, Kenya, Rwanda, South Sudan, Uganda and Tanzania. These countries are enacting laws and developing mining and minerals cadastral systems. However, access to seasonal resources like the sub-surface artisanal mining rights are regulated by customary tenure arrangements. Moreover, the artisanal miners are sometimes migrants, the rights are seasonal and the mining area boundaries not easily identifiable. This paper examines how legislations in East African Community countries provide for the formalization of artisanal mining operations.
Goal and Objectives:
The objective of this article is to compare artisanal mining formalization in the East African Community countries through legislations and development of the mining cadastre. The article compares how different countries specify entities of artisanal mining rights for the inclusion in the mining cadastral system.
Methodology:
The methodological approach adopted for this article was comparative review of legislations, theoretical and empirical literature from the six East African Community countries.
Results:
Four countries; Burundi, Kenya, South Sudan and Uganda directly legislate artisanal mining and grant artisanal mining titles. Artisanal mining titles are reserved for citizens and are transferable. Only South Sudan specify artisanal mining cadastral unit. Therefore identification of cadastral unit remains a puzzle in artisanal mining registration. However, all the mining legislations do not provide for initial adjudication of artisanal mining rights for registration.
References
Bansah, K. J. (2019). From diurnal to nocturnal: Surviving in a chaotic artisanal and small-scale mining sector. Resources Policy, 64, 101475.
Campbell, N. J. (1956). Principles of mineral ownership in the civil law and common law systems. Proceedings (American Bar Association. Section of International and Comparative Law), 37–43.
Chindo, M. (2011). An extensive analysis of mining in Nigeria using a GIS. Journal of Geography and Geology, 3(1), 3.
Chirico, P. G., & Malpeli, K. C. (2014). A Methodological Toolkit for Conducting Field Assessments of Artisanal Alluvial Diamond Deposits.
Cuvelier, J. (2017). Money, migration and masculinity among artisanal miners in Katanga (DR Congo). Review of African Political Economy, 44(152), 204–219.
Dale, P. F., & McLaughlin, J. D. (1988). Land information management: An introduction with special reference to cadastral problems in third world countries.
Dale, P., & McLaughlin, J. (2000). Land administration. Oxford University Press.
Deb, M., Tiwari, G., & Lahiri-Dutt, K. (2008). Artisanal and small scale mining in India: Selected studies and an overview of the issues. International Journal of Mining, Reclamation and Environment, 22(3), 194–209.
Dumas, P., Serdjuk, M., Kutschick, R., Fraser, S., Reith, S., & Koelbel, T. (2013). Report on Geothermal Regulations.
